Spiga

Experts say U.S. doctors overtesting, overtreating

Share


Too much cancer screening, too many heart tests, too many cesarean sections. A spate of recent reports suggest that too many Americans — maybe even President Obama — are being overtreated.

Is it doctors practicing defensive medicine? Or are patients so accustomed to a culture of medical technology that they insist on extensive tests and treatments?

A combination of both is at work, but now new evidence and guidelines are recommending a step back and more thorough doctor-patient conversations about risks and benefits.

As a medical journal editorial said this week about Obama's recent checkup, Americans including the commander in chief need to realize that "more care is not necessarily better care."

Obama's exam included prostate-cancer screening and a virtual colonoscopy. The PSA test for prostate cancer is not routinely recommended for any age and colon screening is not routinely recommended for patients younger than 50. Obama is 48. (PSA stands for prostate-specific antigen screening).

Earlier colon-cancer screening is sometimes recommended for high-risk groups — which a White House spokesman noted includes blacks. Doctors disagree on whether a virtual colonoscopy is the best method. But it's less invasive than traditional colonoscopies and doesn't require sedation — or the possible temporary transfer of presidential power, the White House said.

The colon exam exposed him to radiation "while likely providing no benefit to his care," Dr. Rita Redberg, editor of Archives of Internal Medicine, wrote in an online editorial. "People have come to equate tests with good care and prevention," Redberg, a cardiologist with the University of California, San Francisco, said in an interview Thursday. "Prevention is all the things your mother told you — eat right, exercise, get enough sleep, don't smoke — and we've made it into getting a new test."

This week alone, a New England Journal of Medicine study suggested that too many patients are getting angiograms — invasive imaging tests for heart disease — who don't really need them; and specialists convened by the National Institutes of Health said doctors are too often demanding repeat cesarean deliveries for pregnant women after a first C-section.

Experts dispute how much routine cancer screening saves lives.

Not all doctors and advocacy groups agree with the criticism of screening. Many argue that it can improve survival chances and that saving even a few lives is worth the cost of routinely testing tens of thousands of people.

While some patients clearly do benefit from screening, others clearly do not, said Dr. Richard Wender, former president of the American Cancer Society.

These include very old patients, who may unrealistically fear cancer and demand a screening test, when their risks are far higher of dying from something else, Wender said.

Doctors also often order tests or procedures to protect themselves against lawsuits — so-called defensive medicine — and also because the fee-for-service system compensates them for it, said Dr. Gilbert Welch, a Dartmouth University internist and health-outcomes researcher.

While many patients also demand routine tests, they're often bolstered by advertisements, medical information online — and by doctors, too, Welch said.

The new guidance from the cancer society last week on PSA testing, echoing others' advice on mammograms, is for doctors and patients to thoroughly discuss testing, including a patient's individual disease risks, general pros and cons of testing and possible harms it may cause.

Read More : seattletimes

Medical Identity Theft

Share


     The latest addition to the world of fraud , medical identity theft. You might be wondering what really is " Medical Identity Theft" . It is in simple words , usage of ones health cards by some other person without the knowledge of its real owner. The owner of the card may come to the realization of the fraud only when his service provoder sent him bills for thousands of dollars for some surgeries that he never underwent.
                                     The irony is that most of the fraud are done by family members or close family friends. So the number of cases reported will be very rare. The hospital authorities also didn't check much details once they are provided with health cards , that also is a reason for this fraud to develop.

             To read a detailed report on Medical Identity Theft Read from here  :: Medical Identity Theft

Genetic Variant Offers Protection Against Tuberculosis and Leprosy

Share



When people get exposed to the mycobacterium responsible for tuberculosis (TB), some will become sick with a disease that is a major cause of mortality around the world while others simply don't. Now, researchers reporting in the March 5th issue of the journal Cell, a Cell Press publication, can point to one important reason for this variation in susceptibility or resistance: genetic differences among individuals in levels of an immune enzyme (LTA4H) that is involved in the production of leukotriene B, a pro-inflammatory fatty acid immune signaling molecule.
It turns out individuals who are heterozygous for LTA4H, meaning they carry two versions of the enzyme-encoding gene and produce an average amount of the enzyme (not too little or too much), are less likely to succumb to tuberculosis. They also appear to gain protection against leprosy, a disease which is also caused by mycobacterial infection.
"TB is obviously a big problem," said Lalita Ramakrishnan of the University of Washington. "There isn't a good vaccine, notwithstanding the fact that the TB vaccine has been administered to more people than any other. On top of that, it requires long-term treatment for cure and there is an epidemic of drug-resistant TB. Increasingly, people are becoming infected with strains that are resistant to every antibiotic. On this backdrop, it made sense to go back to the drawing board and try to understand the pathogenesis of the disease."
In the new study, Ramakrishnan and her colleague David Tobin did just that, in an unbiased screen for TB susceptibility genes in the zebrafish. They then collaborated with University of Washington human geneticists Jay Vary, Thomas Hawn and Mary-Claire King and others in Vietnam and Nepal to validate their findings in human populations.
A second study in the same issue of Cell approached the question in another way. Kanury Rao and his colleagues at the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology in India used a genome-wide analysis to produce what now becomes a resource for TB researchers everywhere. They uncovered all of the "cellular machinery" within human macrophages -- the cells primarily targeted by TB -- that interact with the infectious mycobacteria and allow the infection to stably persist.
Rao's team uncovered 275 players within host cells that interact with each other to form a dense network. That picture allowed the researchers to make a detailed molecular-level description of what he refers to as "functional modules" within host cells that are engaged and perturbed by TB infection. Interestingly, they showed that the shape of that interaction varies depending on which isolated strain of TB one considers, suggesting that the different strains rely on somewhat different tactics for successful infection.
Rao's findings offer new leads in the fight against TB, he says. "We identify a core set of molecules which can be targeted through drug development efforts to treat both drug sensitive and multiple drug resistant forms of TB infection. Rather than targeting the pathogen itself, our studies highlight an alternate strategy wherein the host factors required to support pathogen survival can be used as targets for TB therapy."
The discovery of LTA4H as a TB susceptibility gene may have clinical implications too, even if it doesn't offer a direct path to a better vaccine, Ramakrishnan says. For one thing, the finding that medium activity of the immune enzyme is best when it comes to TB might help to explain something that has been known but not well understood in clinical circles: people with hard-to-treat TB sometimes improve when they are given anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive therapies along with more standard drug treatments alone.
Ramakrishnan also notes that the same polymorphisms in LTA4H they uncovered were earlier linked to heart disease. That suggests that drugs that target this pathway in heart disease might be useful in the context of TB, she says.
The connection between infectious disease and heart disease also has implications for understanding the evolution of the immune system's inflammatory responses. "In general, people have thought that inflammation is a positive when it comes to fighting infection, but then it can cause modern-day disease," Ramakrishnan says. The finding that it is heterozygotes -- with intermediate activity of the immunity enzyme -- who fare best in the context of TB and leprosy suggests that in these infections also, inflammation has to be finely tuned for optimal protection.
The researchers include David M. Tobin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Jay C. Vary, Jr., University of Washington, Seattle, WA; John P. Ray, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Gregory S. Walsh, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Division of Basic Science, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Sarah J. Dunstan, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Oxford University, Oxford, UK; Nguyen D. Bang, Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital for Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; Deanna A. Hagge, Mycobacterial Research Laboratory, Anandaban Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal; Saraswoti Khadge, Mycobacterial Research Laboratory, Anandaban Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal; Mary-Claire King, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Thomas R. Hawn, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Cecilia B. Moens, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Division of Basic Science, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; and Lalita Ramakrishnan, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.